AMD A4-3310MX
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Comparing AMD A4-3310MX vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2011
Released
Q2/2019
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparison of AMD A4-3310MX and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G processors by specifications and benchmarks. AMD A4-3310MX runs at base clock 2.10 GHz and has 2 threads, and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G runs at base clock 3.60 GHz and has 4 threads. The architecture and type of processors is different, Llano (K10) Mobile versus Picasso (Zen+) Desktop / Server. The TDP of the first processor is 45 W, and the second one is 65 W. Compare test scores to see which processor is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD A4-3310MX
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    45 W left arrow 65 W
    About 1.44 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
    Around 42% better clock speed
  • More number of cores
    4 left arrow 2
    2 times more cores
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    4.00 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
    Around 38 % better overclocked clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests AMD A4-3310MX vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD A4-3310MX AMD A4-3310MX
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
CPU generation and family

Now let examine the processors version of the AMD A4-3310MX and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.

  • Name
    AMD A4-3310MX left arrow AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD A4-3000M left arrow AMD Ryzen 3000G
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Now let examine the base clock parameters of the AMD A4-3310MX and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.

  • Frequency
    2.10 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.50 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the AMD A4-3310MX and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6480G left arrow AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
  • GPU frequency
    0.44 GHz left arrow 1.25 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    3 left arrow 8
  • Shader
    240 left arrow 512
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q1/2018
Hardware codec support

This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The AMD A4-3310MX and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, AMD A4-3310MX or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 64 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 12
Encryption

We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU AMD A4-3310MX or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Now let us analyze the temps of the AMD A4-3310MX and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.

  • TDP (PL1)
    45 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 45 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 95 °C
Technical details

Contrast the specs of the AMD A4-3310MX and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Llano (K10) left arrow Picasso (Zen+)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Socket
    FS1 left arrow AM4
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q2/2019
Devices using this processor

Let´s all examine the use of the processors AMD A4-3310MX and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons