AMD A6-3400M
Intel Celeron J4125
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Comparing AMD A6-3400M vs Intel Celeron J4125

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2011
Released
Q4/2019
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparison of AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J4125 processors by specifications and benchmarks. AMD A6-3400M runs at base clock 1.40 GHz and has 4 threads, and Intel Celeron J4125 runs at base clock 2.00 GHz and has 4 threads. The architecture and type of processors is different, Llano (K10) Mobile versus Gemini Lake Mobile. The TDP of the first processor is 35 W, and the second one is 10 W. Compare test scores to see which processor is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD A6-3400M
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron J4125
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.40 GHz
    Around 30% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    2.70 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz
    Around 15 % better overclocked clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    10 W left arrow 35 W
    About 0.29 times less performance per watt
Performance tests
Real tests AMD A6-3400M vs Intel Celeron J4125
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD A6-3400M AMD A6-3400M
Intel Celeron J4125 Intel Celeron J4125
CPU generation and family

Now let examine the processors version of the AMD A6-3400M and the Intel Celeron J4125. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.

  • Name
    AMD A6-3400M left arrow Intel Celeron J4125
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 9
  • CPU group
    AMD A6-3000M left arrow Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Now let examine the base clock parameters of the AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J4125 CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.

  • Frequency
    1.40 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.30 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    2.30 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J4125 CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6520G left arrow Intel UHD Graphics 600
  • GPU frequency
    0.40 GHz left arrow 0.25 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.75 GHz
  • Execution units
    5 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    320 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 9.5
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q4/2017
Hardware codec support

This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J4125 processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, AMD A6-3400M or Intel Celeron J4125.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR4-2400LPDDR4-2400
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 8 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 6
Encryption

We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU AMD A6-3400M or Intel Celeron J4125. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Now let us analyze the temps of the AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J4125 CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.

  • TDP (PL1)
    35 W left arrow 10 W
Technical details

Contrast the specs of the AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J4125 CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Llano (K10) left arrow Gemini Lake
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    FS1 left arrow BGA 1090
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q4/2019
Devices using this processor

Let´s all examine the use of the processors AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J4125. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Mini PC Intel Celeron J4125Synology DS720+ 2Bay NASQNAP NAS Intel Celeron J4125
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons