AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Intel Pentium G3250
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Comparing AMD Athlon II X4 860K vs Intel Pentium G3250

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2014
Released
Q3/2014
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparison of AMD Athlon II X4 860K and Intel Pentium G3250 processors by specifications and benchmarks. AMD Athlon II X4 860K runs at base clock 3.70 GHz and has 4 threads, and Intel Pentium G3250 runs at base clock 3.20 GHz and has 2 threads. The architecture and type of processors is different, Kaveri Desktop / Server versus Haswell S Desktop / Server. The TDP of the first processor is 95 W, and the second one is 53 W. Compare test scores to see which processor is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
    Around -16% better clock speed
  • More number of cores
    4 left arrow 2
    2 times more threads
Reasons to consider
Intel Pentium G3250
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    53 W left arrow 95 W
    About 0.56 times less performance per watt
Performance tests
Real tests AMD Athlon II X4 860K vs Intel Pentium G3250
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD Athlon II X4 860K AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Intel Pentium G3250 Intel Pentium G3250
CPU generation and family

Now let examine the processors version of the AMD Athlon II X4 860K and the Intel Pentium G3250. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.

  • Name
    AMD Athlon II X4 860K left arrow Intel Pentium G3250
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Athlon II left arrow Intel Pentium
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 5
  • CPU group
    AMD Athlon II (Kaveri) left arrow Intel Pentium G3000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Now let examine the base clock parameters of the AMD Athlon II X4 860K and Intel Pentium G3250 CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.

  • Frequency
    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.00 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the AMD Athlon II X4 860K and Intel Pentium G3250 CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Haswell GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.35 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 1.10 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 10
  • Shader
    left arrow 80
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 7.5
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 11.1
  • Technology
    left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q4/2012
Hardware codec support

This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The AMD Athlon II X4 860K and Intel Pentium G3250 processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
Memory & PCIe

The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, AMD Athlon II X4 860K or Intel Pentium G3250.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1333
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 16
Encryption

We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU AMD Athlon II X4 860K or Intel Pentium G3250. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Now let us analyze the temps of the AMD Athlon II X4 860K and Intel Pentium G3250 CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.

  • TDP (PL1)
    95 W left arrow 53 W
Technical details

Contrast the specs of the AMD Athlon II X4 860K and Intel Pentium G3250 CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 3.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Kaveri left arrow Haswell S
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    FM2+ left arrow LGA 1150
  • Release date
    Q4/2014 left arrow Q3/2014
Devices using this processor

Let´s all examine the use of the processors AMD Athlon II X4 860K and Intel Pentium G3250. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons