Comparing AMD E-240 vs AMD FX-8370

Now let examine the processors version of the AMD E-240 and the AMD FX-8370. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.

• Name
  AMD E-240 AMD FX-8370
• Segment
  Mobile Desktop / Server
• Family
  AMD E AMD FX
• Generation
  1 2
• CPU group
  AMD E/E1/E2-1000 AMD FX-8000

Now let examine the base clock parameters of the AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.

• Frequency
  1.50 GHz 4.00 GHz
• CPU Cores
  1 8
• Turbo (1 Core)
  No turbo 4.30 GHz
• CPU Threads
  1 8
• Hyperthreading
  No No
• Overclocking
  No Yes
• Core architecture
  normal normal

You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.

• GPU name
  AMD Radeon HD 6310 no iGPU
• GPU frequency
  0.49 GHz
• GPU (Turbo)
  No turbo No turbo
• Execution units
  1
• Shader
  80
• Max. GPU Memory
  1 GB --
• Max. displays
  2
• Generation
  3
• DirectX Version
  11
• Technology
  40 nm
• Release date
  Q4/2010

This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.

• h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
  No No
• h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
  No No
• h264
  Decode No
• VP9
  No No
• VP8
  No No
• AV1
  No No
• AVC
  Decode No
• VC-1
  Decode No
• JPEG
  Decode / Encode No

The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, AMD E-240 or AMD FX-8370.

• Memory type
  DDR3-1066 DDR3-1866
• ECC
  No Yes
• Memory channels
  1 2

We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU AMD E-240 or AMD FX-8370. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.

• AES-NI
  Yes Yes

Now let us analyze the temps of the AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.

• TDP (PL1)
  18 W 125 W

Contrast the specs of the AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.

• Instruction set (ISA)
  x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
• Virtualization
  AMD-V AMD-V
• ISA extensions
  SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
• L3-Cache
  1.00 MB 8.00 MB
• Architecture
  Zacate (Bobcat) Vishera (Bulldozer)
• Technology
  32 nm 32 nm
• Socket
  BGA 413 AM3+
• Release date
  Q1/2011 Q3/2014

Let´s all examine the use of the processors AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).

• Used in
  Unknown Unknown