AMD E-240
AMD FX-8370
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer

Comparing AMD E-240 vs AMD FX-8370

Overall score
star star star star star
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparison of AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 processors by specifications and benchmarks. AMD E-240 runs at base clock 1.50 GHz and has 1 threads, and AMD FX-8370 runs at base clock 4.00 GHz and has 8 threads. The architecture and type of processors is different, Zacate (Bobcat) Mobile versus Vishera (Bulldozer) Desktop / Server. The TDP of the first processor is 18 W, and the second one is 125 W. Compare test scores to see which processor is better.

Reasons to consider
AMD E-240
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    18 W left arrow 125 W
    About 6.94 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8370
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    4.00 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz
    Around 63% better clock speed
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 1
    8 times more cores
Performance tests
Real tests AMD E-240 vs AMD FX-8370
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD E-240 AMD E-240
AMD FX-8370 AMD FX-8370
CPU generation and family

Now let examine the processors version of the AMD E-240 and the AMD FX-8370. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.

  • Name
    AMD E-240 left arrow AMD FX-8370
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD E left arrow AMD FX
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD E/E1/E2-1000 left arrow AMD FX-8000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Now let examine the base clock parameters of the AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.

  • Frequency
    1.50 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    1 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 4.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    1 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6310 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.49 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    1 left arrow
  • Shader
    80 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow
  • Generation
    3 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow
  • Technology
    40 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q4/2010 left arrow
Hardware codec support

This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, AMD E-240 or AMD FX-8370.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1066 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2

We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU AMD E-240 or AMD FX-8370. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Now let us analyze the temps of the AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.

  • TDP (PL1)
    18 W left arrow 125 W
Technical details

Contrast the specs of the AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370 CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Zacate (Bobcat) left arrow Vishera (Bulldozer)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 413 left arrow AM3+
  • Release date
    Q1/2011 left arrow Q3/2014
Devices using this processor

Let´s all examine the use of the processors AMD E-240 and AMD FX-8370. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons