Comparing AMD Phenom II X4 920 vs Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3

Now let examine the processors version of the AMD Phenom II X4 920 and the Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.

• Name
  AMD Phenom II X4 920 Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
• Segment
  Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
• Family
  AMD Phenom II Intel Xeon E5
• Generation
  4 5
• CPU group
  AMD Phenom II - 800/900 Intel Xeon E5 v3

Now let examine the base clock parameters of the AMD Phenom II X4 920 and Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.

• Frequency
  2.80 GHz 2.00 GHz
• CPU Cores
  4 6
• Turbo (1 Core)
  No turbo No turbo
• CPU Threads
  4 12
• Hyperthreading
  No Yes
• Overclocking
  Yes No
• Core architecture
  normal normal

You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the AMD Phenom II X4 920 and Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.

• GPU name
  no iGPU no iGPU
• GPU (Turbo)
  No turbo No turbo

This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The AMD Phenom II X4 920 and Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.

• h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
  No No
• h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
  No No
• h264
  No No
• VP9
  No No
• VP8
  No No
• AV1
  No No
• AVC
  No No
• VC-1
  No No
• JPEG
  No No

The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, AMD Phenom II X4 920 or Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3.

• Memory type
  DDR2-1066 DDR4-2133
• ECC
  No Yes
• Memory channels
  2 4
• PCIe version
  3.0
• PCIe lanes
  40

We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU AMD Phenom II X4 920 or Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.

• AES-NI
  No Yes

Now let us analyze the temps of the AMD Phenom II X4 920 and Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.

• TDP (PL1)
  125 W 52 W

Contrast the specs of the AMD Phenom II X4 920 and Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.

• Instruction set (ISA)
  x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
• Virtualization
  AMD-V VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
• ISA extensions
  SSE3, SSE4a SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
• L3-Cache
  6.00 MB 15.00 MB
• Architecture
  Deneb (K10) Haswell E
• Technology
  45 nm 22 nm
• Socket
  AM2+ LGA 2011-3
• Release date
  Q1/2009 Q3/2014

Let´s all examine the use of the processors AMD Phenom II X4 920 and Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).

• Used in
  Unknown Unknown