Apple A9
Apple A10X Fusion
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Comparing Apple A9 vs Apple A10X Fusion

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2015
Released
Q2/2017
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparison of Apple A9 and Apple A10X Fusion processors by specifications and benchmarks. Apple A9 runs at base clock 1.85 GHz and has 2 threads, and Apple A10X Fusion runs at base clock 1.30 GHz and has 6 threads. The architecture and type of processors is different, A9 Mobile versus A10 Mobile. The TDP of the first processor is 5 W, and the second one is 8 W. Compare test scores to see which processor is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Apple A9
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.85 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
    Around -42% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    5 W left arrow 8 W
    About 1.6 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
Apple A10X Fusion
Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    6 left arrow 2
    3 times more cores
Performance tests
Real tests Apple A9 vs Apple A10X Fusion
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Apple A9 Apple A9
Apple A10X Fusion Apple A10X Fusion
CPU generation and family

Now let examine the processors version of the Apple A9 and the Apple A10X Fusion. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.

  • Name
    Apple A9 left arrow Apple A10X Fusion
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Apple A series left arrow Apple A series
  • Generation
    9 left arrow 10
  • CPU group
    Apple A9/A9X left arrow Apple A10/A10X
  • Predecessor
    Apple A8 left arrow Apple A9X
  • Successor
    Apple A10 Fusion left arrow Apple A12Z Bionic
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Now let examine the base clock parameters of the Apple A9 and Apple A10X Fusion CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.

  • Frequency
    1.85 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 6
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 2.38 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 6
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A core
    2x Twister left arrow 3x Hurricane
  • B core
    -- left arrow 3x Zephyr
Internal Graphics

You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the Apple A9 and Apple A10X Fusion CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.

  • GPU name
    Apple A9 left arrow Apple A10X
  • GPU frequency
    0.65 GHz left arrow 0.90 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    192 left arrow 384
  • Max. GPU Memory
    4 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 1
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 7
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Release date
    Q3/2015 left arrow Q2/2017
Hardware codec support

This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The Apple A9 and Apple A10X Fusion processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, Apple A9 or Apple A10X Fusion.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR4-3200 left arrow LPDDR4-3200
  • Max. Memory
    2 GB left arrow 3 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
Encryption

We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU Apple A9 or Apple A10X Fusion. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Now let us analyze the temps of the Apple A9 and Apple A10X Fusion CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.

  • TDP (PL1)
    5 W left arrow 8 W
Technical details

Contrast the specs of the Apple A9 and Apple A10X Fusion CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • L2-Cache
    3.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    A9 left arrow A10
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q3/2015 left arrow Q2/2017
Devices using this processor

Let´s all examine the use of the processors Apple A9 and Apple A10X Fusion. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).

  • Used in
    Apple iPhone 6sApple iPhone SE (1. Gen) left arrow Apple iPad Pro (2. Gen)Apple TV 4K
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons