CPU generation and family
Now let examine the processors version of the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.
-
Name
HiSilicon Kirin 655
Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H
-
Segment
Mobile
Desktop / Server
-
Family
HiSilicon Kirin
Intel Xeon Platinum
-
Generation
4
3
-
CPU group
HiSilicon Kirin 650
Intel Xeon Platinum 8300
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
Now let examine the base clock parameters of the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.
-
Frequency
1.70 GHz
2.50 GHz
-
CPU Cores
8
18
-
Turbo (1 Core)
2.12 GHz
3.80 GHz
-
CPU Threads
8
36
-
Hyperthreading
No
Yes
-
Overclocking
No
No
-
Core architecture
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
normal
-
A core
4x Cortex-A53
--
-
B core
4x Cortex-A53
--
Internal Graphics
You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.
-
GPU name
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
no iGPU
-
GPU frequency
0.90 GHz
-
GPU (Turbo)
0.90 GHz
No turbo
-
Execution units
2
-
Shader
32
-
Max. displays
2
-
Generation
Midgard 4
-
DirectX Version
11
-
Technology
28nm
-
Release date
Q4/2015
Hardware codec support
This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.
-
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode / Encode
No
-
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode
No
-
h264
Decode / Encode
No
-
VP9
No
No
-
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
-
AV1
No
No
-
AVC
No
No
-
VC-1
No
No
-
JPEG
Decode / Encode
No
Memory & PCIe
The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, HiSilicon Kirin 655 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H.
-
Memory type
LPDDR3-933
DDR4-3200
-
Max. Memory
1152 GB
-
ECC
No
Yes
-
Memory channels
2
6
-
PCIe version
3.0
-
PCIe lanes
48
Encryption
We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU HiSilicon Kirin 655 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.
-
AES-NI
No
Yes
Thermal Management
Now let us analyze the temps of the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.
-
TDP (PL1)
150 W
Technical details
Contrast the specs of the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.
-
Instruction set (ISA)
ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
-
Virtualization
None
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
-
ISA extensions
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
-
L3-Cache
--
24.75 MB
-
Architecture
Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53
Cooper Lake
-
Technology
16 nm
14 nm
-
Socket
N/A
LGA 4189
-
Release date
Q2/2016
Q2/2020
Devices using this processor
Let´s all examine the use of the processors HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).
-
Used in
Unknown
Unknown