HiSilicon Kirin 655
Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Comparing HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2016
Released
Q2/2020
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparison of HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H processors by specifications and benchmarks. HiSilicon Kirin 655 runs at base clock 1.70 GHz and has 8 threads, and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H runs at base clock 2.50 GHz and has 36 threads. The architecture and type of processors is different, Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 Mobile versus Cooper Lake Desktop / Server. The TDP of the first processor is , and the second one is 150 W. Compare test scores to see which processor is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 655
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.50 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
    Around 32% better clock speed
  • More number of cores
    18 left arrow 8
    2 times more cores
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    3.80 GHz left arrow 2.12 GHz
    Around 44 % better overclocked clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
HiSilicon Kirin 655 HiSilicon Kirin 655
Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H
CPU generation and family

Now let examine the processors version of the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 655 left arrow Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Intel Xeon Platinum
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 650 left arrow Intel Xeon Platinum 8300
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Now let examine the base clock parameters of the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.

  • Frequency
    1.70 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 18
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.12 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 36
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow normal
  • A core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow --
  • B core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow --
Internal Graphics

You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T830 MP2 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.90 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.90 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    2 left arrow
  • Shader
    32 left arrow
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow
  • Generation
    Midgard 4 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow
  • Technology
    28nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q4/2015 left arrow
Hardware codec support

This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, HiSilicon Kirin 655 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-933 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 1152 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 6
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 48
Encryption

We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU HiSilicon Kirin 655 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Now let us analyze the temps of the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.

  • TDP (PL1)
    left arrow 150 W
Technical details

Contrast the specs of the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 24.75 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Cooper Lake
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow LGA 4189
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q2/2020
Devices using this processor

Let´s all examine the use of the processors HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons