Intel Atom C3850
Intel Xeon Silver 4114T
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Comparing Intel Atom C3850 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4114T

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2017
Released
Q3/2017
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparison of Intel Atom C3850 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T processors by specifications and benchmarks. Intel Atom C3850 runs at base clock 2.10 GHz and has 12 threads, and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T runs at base clock 2.20 GHz and has 20 threads. The architecture and type of processors is different, Denverton Desktop / Server versus Skylake SP Desktop / Server. The TDP of the first processor is 25 W, and the second one is 85 W. Compare test scores to see which processor is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom C3850
Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    12 left arrow 10
    2 times more threads
  • Performance per watt
    25 W left arrow 85 W
    About 3.4 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon Silver 4114T
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.20 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
    Around 5% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    3.00 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
    Around 20 % better overclocked clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Atom C3850 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4114T
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Atom C3850 Intel Atom C3850
Intel Xeon Silver 4114T Intel Xeon Silver 4114T
CPU generation and family

Now let examine the processors version of the Intel Atom C3850 and the Intel Xeon Silver 4114T. The higher the model´s version and the more current generation, the better.

  • Name
    Intel Atom C3850 left arrow Intel Xeon Silver 4114T
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Atom left arrow Intel Xeon Silver
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    Intel Atom C3000 left arrow Intel Xeon Silver 4100
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Now let examine the base clock parameters of the Intel Atom C3850 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T CPUs. The processor with the highest score is victorious. You may also compare the turbo frequency in some models.

  • Frequency
    2.10 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    12 left arrow 10
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.40 GHz left arrow 3.00 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    12 left arrow 20
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

You may determine which included graphics card is superior by analyzing the Intel Atom C3850 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T CPUs. Nevertheless, not every model can also include an integrated video card. The block has no bearing on the overall performance score and can be skipped.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This is time to examine how CPUs differ in terms of hardware support for codecs. Each brand may have its own set of guidelines. The Intel Atom C3850 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T processor technologies are shown below for a more detailed comparison.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

The kind and amount of memory supported by the CPU have an impact on the performance ranking. As a consequence, experts recommend that you carefully compare which model produces the greatest outcomes. In our case, Intel Atom C3850 or Intel Xeon Silver 4114T.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
  • Max. Memory
    256 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 6
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow 48
Encryption

We decide in favor of an encryption-capable CPU Intel Atom C3850 or Intel Xeon Silver 4114T. If competing CPUs have the same performance in this block, you should compare other technical aspects.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Now let us analyze the temps of the Intel Atom C3850 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T CPUs. It is critical to note that the greater the processor´s TDP, the more efficient the cooling system would be required. A CPU with a lower TDP is said to be the best model.

  • TDP (PL1)
    25 W left arrow 85 W
  • Tjunction max.
    100 °C left arrow --
Technical details

Contrast the specs of the Intel Atom C3850 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T CPUs, including L2-L3 cache, release date, motherboard socket, manufacturing method, ISA instruction set, and much more. Give heed to L2 and L3 - the higher this indication, the better; similarly, the smaller the technical process, the better.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L2-Cache
    12.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 14.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Denverton left arrow Skylake SP
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1310 left arrow LGA 3647
  • Release date
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q3/2017
Devices using this processor

Let´s all examine the use of the processors Intel Atom C3850 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T. Based on this comparison, you will understand the processor´s intended use (gaming, design, editing, mining, work, business).

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons