Select processor 1
Select processor 2
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT
ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Comparing INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT vs ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019

Comparison of INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT video card vs ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB video card by specs and benchmarks. INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT runs at 1.485 GHz base clock speed and has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, while video card ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB runs at 2.200 GHz base clock speed and has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The weight is different, -- vs 385 g. The TDP of the first video card is 75 W, and the second is 107 W . Compare the benchmark results to find out which video card is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.200 GHz left arrow 1.485 GHz
    Around 33% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT vs ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB
The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS
Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations
The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed
The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021
The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT
ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB
GPU

Video card assessment by generation and group The more advanced and efficient the model, the higher the video card model. Higher generation video cards are usually more efficient and have modern ram. Keep track of the number of shaders (the more the better). In our case, INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT and ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5) left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
  • GPU Chip
    TU117-300-A1 left arrow Navi 24 XT
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 16
  • Shader
    896 left arrow 1024
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    56 left arrow 64
Memory

Memory storage performance has been compared between the INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT and the ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB video cards. The more Memory a graphic card has, the faster the GPU can do operations. This sector is taken into account in the evaluation ranking outcomes. Take into account the amount of ram, the kind of ram, and the ram bus bandwidth. The greater the sum of these figures, the faster and more efficient the video card.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 0 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    128 GB/s left arrow 144 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 64 bit
Clock Speeds

Let´s begin with a comparison of the INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT and the ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB´s basic clock speeds. The quicker the GPU boots up and turbos, the more productive and efficient it is in games and industrial uses. This component influences the overall gameplay of the video card. The video card with the greatest clock frequency performance will win.

  • Base Clock
    1.485 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.665 GHz left arrow 2.815 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 2.610 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design

Now let examine the thermal performance of the INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT and ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB video cards. Temperature control (TDP) is an important indicator. The more advanced the computational burden, the more difficult it is to cool the graphics chipset.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 107 W
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 110 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans

The vast majority of graphics chipset cooling options are dynamic, with cooling systems via aluminum or copper radiators being less common. Here examines and compares the various forms of cooling used by companies. In our case, INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT and ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    1 x 100 mm left arrow 1 x 100 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow 0 dB / Silent
Connectivity

Technical information on the various connections provided for connecting your video card INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT or ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB to remote systems. Details and a review of video cards depending on the number of HDMI ports, in addition to the variation in the largest amount of displays that may be attached, are available below.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 2
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    2x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4a
Featureset

INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT vs. ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB video cards evaluated in terms of the fastest possible display settings, DirectX versions, and backlight options.

  • Max. resolution
    3840x2160 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

The following video formats are available by the INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT and ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB video cards: This data has no bearing on the average performance rating.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

This table compares the size, height, cost, and number of PCIe ports on your system of the video cards INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT with ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB. Choose a video card that fits within your pc casing.

  • Length
    160 mm left arrow 179 mm
  • Height
    116 mm left arrow 124 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 40 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 385 g
Additional data

You can examine the INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT and ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Challenger ITX 4GB video cards´ publication date, CPU production technique, and PCIe network model available.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 4
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q1/2022
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    N16501-04D5-1510VA19 left arrow RX6500XT CLI 4G
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons